Priya R. joined 4 minutes ago
Hi everyone! Just joined — I'm launching a nutrition membership in October and honestly have no idea where to start.
Nova, Kai and Sage work inside your HighLevel community — welcoming new members by name, answering questions in minutes, and celebrating every win in public. Disclosed AI, on the contact record, fired by your own workflows.
Welcome people by name. Never let a question sit past a day. Celebrate wins publicly. Every good operator teaches the same cadence — and almost nobody runs it, because running it is a full-time job and most community owners already have one.
Most churn isn't a pricing problem wearing a pricing costume — it's an onboarding one. Members who don't reach a first win in week one quietly cancel before month two. The first seven days decide the year.
Not one chatbot with a personality setting. Each agent has a job, a voice, and a list of things it will never do — because an agent that tries to do everything ends up trusted with nothing.
This is the cadence Circle, FeverBee and every Skool practitioner teaches. It works. It also takes an hour a day, every day, for every member who joins. That's the part the agents take.
Every step above is fired by a real HighLevel Workflow trigger — the same ones your automations already use. Nothing here is a scraper or a browser extension.
AI in communities isn't new. But look closely at what each tool is actually allowed to touch: most of them either tell the owner what to do, or talk to members privately where nobody else can see it. The public feed — where trust is actually built — is empty.
| Tool | Acts in the public feed | Knows your CRM record | Fired by your workflows |
|---|---|---|---|
| HighLevel native AI | Scheduled posts only — no replies | Yes | Partly |
| Circle AI Agents | DMs and search | Circle's own data | No |
| Mighty Co-Host | Advises you, doesn't act | No | No |
| Skool | Auto-DM only | No | No public API |
| Community Agents | Posts, comments, likes | Tags, fields, pipeline | Native triggers |
The difference compounds: because the agent can see the contact record, a win in the feed becomes a tag, a pipeline move, and a note in your Monday brief. Because it runs on HighLevel triggers, it fires on what members actually do — not on a schedule you have to maintain.
Every agent is named as AI, badged as AI, and explains itself in a pinned post. Your members will know it's AI — and they'll still show up, because someone answered them at 7am.
This isn't only principle. The FTC's rule on fake reviews and testimonials, effective October 2024, carries civil penalties for AI-generated endorsements from people who don't exist. Disclosure isn't a constraint on the product — it's the reason it's safe to run.
Autonomy is set per action, not per agent. Welcomes can run on their own from day one while anything that touches money stays behind your approval — and you can change your mind on a Tuesday.
Each thing an agent can do is set to Auto, Approve, or Off — independently.
Drafts queue up for one-tap edit-and-send. Your edits become the agent's preferences.
Rate limits so nobody gets piled on, quiet hours in the member's timezone, a full audit log, and one button that stops everything.
We're building this with a small number of HighLevel community owners before it opens up. If that's you, tell us what you're running — the roadmap gets shaped around the first people in.
No call, no card. We'll email you the moment it opens.
We'll only email you about Community Agents.
Yes, and that's deliberate. Every agent has AI in its name, an AI badge on its avatar, and a pinned post explaining what it is. The first time an agent interacts with any member it says so in a line. Members tolerate — and increasingly expect — a labelled AI helper. What they punish is impersonation.
No. Community Agents is built for HighLevel Communities specifically, because that's where we can reach both the feed and the CRM record behind every member. Skool has no public API, and Circle's data stays inside Circle. Depth is the whole point — a shallow version of this on four platforms would be worse than a deep version on one.
Not unless you let it. Every action starts on Approve, so drafts come to you before they go out; you loosen it action by action as you get comfortable. Quill in particular is trained on your own posts, so what it drafts already sounds like you — and it never publishes without approval by default.
It is, and we don't do it. The FTC's rule on fake reviews and testimonials makes AI-generated endorsements from non-existent people a civil penalty matter. Our agents never pose as members, never fabricate wins or testimonials, and never inflate anything to look popular. They amplify things real people actually said.
Not set yet — that's part of what we're working out with the first group. LC Bridge prices per active sub-account rather than per seat, and Community Agents will follow the same shape. Join the waitlist and you'll hear the number before anyone else.
It's in build now. The waitlist is how we choose who gets in first, and the earliest people in have the most influence over what ships. If you're running a HighLevel community today, say so on the form — that moves you up.